Eagle Forum Legislative Alerts

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Abortion Harms the Whole Family

In the world of feminism, abortion is sacred. The National Organization for Women has passed resolution after resolution claiming that abortion is a fundamental human right. That’s a bold claim if you look at the history of abortion laws in our country, as I do in my new book, Who Killed the American Family? Abortion was traditionally illegal in the United States. Only in the 1960s did a few states, one by one, start to change their laws. Even then, states moved slowly to make changes. The New York legislature passed an abortion-on-demand law but then revoked it two years later, although Governor Nelson Rockefeller vetoed the repeal. Voters in North Dakota and Michigan rejected pro-abortion laws in landslide referenda during the 1972 elections.

Monday, October 20, 2014

The Radicalism of Feminism

What comes to mind when you think of the word feminism? Is it equality between men and women? If you put it that way, feminism might sound like a good idea, but in my new book, Who Killed the American Family?, I show just how extreme the feminist goals really are.

Charts show bad economic trends

If you think that our economy is doing well, you need to see these 12 charts.

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Explaining the feminist paradox

Here is a new study, from Sweden:
The feminist movement purports to improve conditions for women, and yet only a minority of women in modern societies self-identify as feminists. This is known as the feminist paradox. It has been suggested that feminists exhibit both physiological and psychological characteristics associated with heightened masculinization, which may predispose women for heightened competitiveness, sex-atypical behaviors, and belief in the interchangeability of sex roles. If feminist activists, i.e., those that manufacture the public image of feminism, are indeed masculinized relative to women in general, this might explain why the views and preferences of these two groups are at variance with each other. We measured the 2D:4D digit ratios (collected from both hands) and a personality trait known as dominance (measured with the Directiveness scale) in a sample of women attending a feminist conference. The sample exhibited significantly more masculine 2D:4D and higher dominance ratings than comparison samples representative of women in general, and these variables were furthermore positively correlated for both hands. The feminist paradox might thus to some extent be explained by biological differences between women in general and the activist women who formulate the feminist agenda. ...

That three-quarters of women are concerned about women’s rights while less than one-third consider themselves feminists is known as the feminist paradox (Abowitz, 2008, p. 51; Scharff, 2012). Part of the explanation for this paradox might result from the fact that there are many different conceptions of what feminism is or ought to be, and that it lacks a commonly established definition. This is not least of all because the underlying ideologies and opinions of the movement have undergone substantive shifts over the course of the 20th century (Scharff, 2012). Today, several different strands of feminism are currently recognized, the most established ones including Womanism and Liberal, Radical, Socialist, and Cultural Feminism (e.g., Henley et al., 2000).

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Gina Loudon — What Women Really Want

Women can reclaim America's greatness, but feminism is not the way. Women can be strong without making men weak, and they can be bold without being rude. Join us as we discuss the true feminine spirit.

Listen to Eagle Forum Live Radio Program aired on 10-18-14

Listen every Saturday (11-Noon CST): Bott Radio Network

Archived Eagle Forum Live Radio Programs