Eagle Forum Legislative Alerts

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Brooks drinks the Obama Kool-Aid

To liberal followers of the NY Times and PBS TV, David Brooks is the spokesman for conservatives. This is in spite of the fact that he was tricked into supporting Barack Obama:
On Thursday’s “The Laura Ingraham Show,” Brooks said he still admired Obama, but conceded the president was more liberal than he originally thought.

“Yeah, I still like him — admire him personally,” Brooks said. “He’s certainly more liberal than I thought he was. And he’s more liberal than he thinks he is. He thinks he is just slightly center-left. But when you got down to his instincts, they’re pretty left. And his problem is he can’t really act on them because it would be political disaster. And so that means, I think he is doing very little — proposing very little.”
Now Brooks is promoting liberalism in his latest column:
Why aren’t there more liberals in America?

It’s not because liberalism lacks cultural power. Many polls suggest that a majority of college professors and national journalists vote Democratic. The movie, TV, music and publishing industries are dominated by liberals.

It’s not because recent events have disproved the liberal world view. On the contrary, we’re still recovering from a financial crisis caused, in large measure, by Wall Street excess.
What? The financial crisis was caused by liberal policies of promoting home loans to people who were living beyond their means, and by Wall Street financiers who overwhelmingly vote Democratic and support liberal causes. The crisis was made worse by liberal bailouts. Yes, these liberal policies were proved wrong.

We have had several years of liberal economic policies, and they have failed. The stimulus bills have made unemployment worse, no better.

But here is Brooks's solution:
Liberalism has not expanded because it has not had a Martin Luther, a leader committed to stripping away the corruptions, complexities and indulgences that have grown up over the years.

If you’ll forgive some outside advice, President Barack Obama might consider running for re-election as Luther.
Martin Luther is mainly known for arguing that a more literal reading of the Bible implies that salvation is an unconditional gift from God. I don't really see how this helps Obama get re-elected to expand liberalism. I would dismiss this as a silly liberal rant, except that Brooks is supposed to be a conservative.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Keep comments short. Long comments will be deleted.